Search alternatives:
significantly declined » significant decline (Expand Search), significantly delayed (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly declined » significant decline (Expand Search), significantly delayed (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
-
481
Voxel-based whole-brain analysis shows regional and dose-dependent effects of netoglitazone in decreasing plaque mean size.
Published 2025“…However, there is only a minimal effect on decreasing plaque size. (C) Short-term-treatment with a high dose of netoglitazone reveals a significant reduction in plaque size, especially observed in the hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, midbrain, and hindbrain. …”
-
482
Supplementary Material for: Decreased Lactococcus lactis and propionic acid in feces of patients with Moyamoya disease: Possible implications of immune dysregulation
Published 2025“…Results: There were no significant differences in α- and b-diversities among feces from the MMD patients and controls. …”
-
483
Table 1_Multi-generational adaptation to Solanum nigrum increases reproduction and decreases microbial diversity of Aphis gossypii.docx
Published 2025“…The relative abundance of Buchnera in T5 and T10 significantly increased compared to M and T, while the relative abundance of Arsenophonus decreased markedly. …”
-
484
Data Sheet 1_Bio-functional hydrogel coated membranes to decrease T-cell exhaustion in manufacturing of CAR T-cells.docx
Published 2025“…Additionally, increased T-cell transduction and decreased exhaustion for the CAR T population were observed with HCMs. …”
-
485
-
486
-
487
-
488
-
489
-
490
-
491
-
492
-
493
-
494
-
495
ERI Thresholds Between Adjacent Zones.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
496
Location of the study area.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
497
Random Forest structure with cross-validation.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
498
Land use change from 1990 to 2020.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
499
Geographic data.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”
-
500
Classification accuracy.
Published 2025“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”