Search alternatives:
significantly estimated » significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
significantly estimated » significantly mitigated (Expand Search), significant estimates (Expand Search), significantly overestimated (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease risk » increased risk (Expand Search), increases risk (Expand Search), disease risk (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Estimated effects of the intervention packages on the incidence of NCDs metabolic risk factors.
Published 2024Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
QUIPS risk of bias assessment.
Published 2023“…Higher estimates of peak, measured and as a percentagege of predicted, showed significant associations with a lower risk of mortality [MD: 3.66, 95% CI: 0.88; 6.43 and MD: 16.49, 95% CI: 6.92; 26.07] and fewer complications [MD: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.12; 3.00 and MD: 9.82, 95% CI: 5.88; 13.76]. …”
-
13
Coefficient estimates (log-odds scale).
Published 2024“…Specifically, we detect a detrimental effect (i.e., a significant decrease in the intercept) of the disgust-eliciting image in Incongruent condition (vs. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
The effect of the use of a decision aid with individual risk estimation on the mode of delivery after a caesarean section: A prospective cohort study
Published 2019“…We hypothesize that counselling with the DA does not decrease VBAC rates. In addition, we aimed to study the effects on unplanned CS rate, patient involvement in decision-making and elective repeat CS rates.…”
-
20
SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers.
Published 2021“…(a) Breast cancer incidence in female SLE cohort is significantly decreased by SLE status (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.74, p = 0.0036). …”