Showing 1 - 20 results of 122 for search '(( significantly greater decrease ) OR ( significant linear decrease ))~', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Test soil parameters. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
  10. 10

    Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
  11. 11

    UHMWPF parameters. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
  12. 12

    Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
  13. 13

    Soil partice-size distribution. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 16

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 17

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20