Search alternatives:
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly greater » significantly correlated (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly greater » significantly correlated (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
-
2681
Sample Posts from the ADHD dataset.
Published 2025“…Furthermore underlined by the considerable decrease in model size without appreciable performance loss is the lower computational resources needed for training and deployment, hence facilitating greater applicability. …”
-
2682
Top-level overview for ADHD classification study.
Published 2025“…Furthermore underlined by the considerable decrease in model size without appreciable performance loss is the lower computational resources needed for training and deployment, hence facilitating greater applicability. …”
-
2683
Effects and Potential Risks of Chiral Penflufen on Pickled Cowpea: Combined Microbiome and Metabolomics
Published 2025“…<i>Rac</i>-penflufen treatment significantly decreased the relative abundance of <i>Lactiplantibacillus</i> while increasing <i>Weissella</i>, but the opposite effects were found in <i>R</i>- and <i>S</i>-penflufen treatments. …”
-
2684
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2685
Procedural characteristics.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2686
Clinical characteristics.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2687
Study flowchart.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2688
Data.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. …”
-
2689
CONSORT diagram of the study.
Published 2024“…The control group showed a significant increase in COM angle sway excursion (lateral direction) (p = 0.011, d = 0.27, 95% CI [-0.19, 0.74]) and a decrease in TMT-A time (p = 0.031, d = 0.38, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.85]). …”
-
2690
-
2691
-
2692
Qualitative Examples of Corrected Sentences.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2693
Ablation Experiment Results.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2694
Meaning of Each Model.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2695
Overview of Related Work.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2696
Parameter Settings.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2697
Comparison with Advanced Models.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2698
Overall Model Architecture.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2699
Baseline Transformer model configuration.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”
-
2700
Comparison Results on CoNLL-2014 Dataset.
Published 2025“…The results show that the proposed model significantly outperforms the baseline model in terms of accuracy (improving from 0.78 to 0.85), recall (improving from 0.81 to 0.87), and F1 score (improving from 0.79 to 0.86). …”