بدائل البحث:
significantly greater » significantly correlated (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث), significantly higher (توسيع البحث)
significantly lower » significantly higher (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
lower decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), linear decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
significantly greater » significantly correlated (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث), significantly higher (توسيع البحث)
significantly lower » significantly higher (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
lower decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), linear decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
1741
Original data1.
منشور في 2025"…Our analysis revealed that <i>RP11-502I4.3</i> expression was lower in the retinas of diabetic rats and HG-stimulated HRMECs compared with normal glucose conditions. …"
-
1742
-
1743
-
1744
-
1745
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1746
The results of endogenous analysis.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1747
Correlation test.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1748
S1 Dataset -
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1749
The mediation of confidence.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1750
Robustness test.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1751
The effects of consumption inequality on SWB.
منشور في 2024"…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …"
-
1752
-
1753
-
1754
-
1755
-
1756
Functional and strength parameters.
منشور في 2025"…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Bilateral quantitative MRI of the lower limbs was performed in individuals with LGMD-R9 and healthy controls. …"
-
1757
Baseline characteristics.
منشور في 2025"…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …"
-
1758
Data ste.
منشور في 2025"…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …"
-
1759
Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures.
منشور في 2025"…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …"
-
1760