Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly change (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly change (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
-
3261
Activity of xylanase in mixed feed and liver (mg saccharide/g sample/h), n = 12/treatment.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3262
-
3263
Composition of the gut microbiota at the phylum level following the administration of MP.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3264
-
3265
-
3266
-
3267
-
3268
-
3269
-
3270
Electromagnetic torque ripple.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3271
The evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3272
ANN architecture.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3273
Electromagnetic torque ripple comparison.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3274
Evolution.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3275
Tip speed ratio.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3276
ANN architecture and configuration.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3277
Mechanical speed.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3278
Wind speed profile.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3279
Correlation coefficient (R).
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”
-
3280
Electromagnetic torque.
Published 2025“…Analysis of the simulation results for the proposed control versus field-oriented control (FOC) shows that the proposed control strategy exhibits less ripples in the electromagnetic torque, with the ripple ratio decreasing significantly from 32.95% to 19.43%. In addition, the THDs of the stator current decreased from 20.87% to 14.88%, proving the reliability and efficiency of the proposed control strategy compared to FOC. …”