Search alternatives:
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search), significantly changed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
high increased » hifu increased (Expand Search), weight increased (Expand Search), width increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search), significantly changed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
high increased » hifu increased (Expand Search), weight increased (Expand Search), width increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Significant interaction (time by group) for PPTd.
Published 2022“…<p>The measurement of pain pressure threshold (mean±standard error) on the Deltoid (PPTd) showed that responders (black solid line) demonstrated a significant decrease in PPTd following eccentric exercise. …”
-
6
-
7
Summary of metabolites with statistically significant association with mortality at 6 months.
Published 2024Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
Mean local cortical blood volume increases for low-reward blocks and decreases for high, in alternating ramp-like drifts.
Published 2019“…All the statistically significant data points lie in the upper left quadrant, “Lo(-)/Hi(+)”—i.e., with negative slopes for low- and positive slope for high-reward blocks (<i>N</i> = 19 experiments: using only those with at least 10 pairs of alternating blocks of 10 trials each). …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
Maximum, minimum, and mean air temperatures in Ningbo from August 1 to September 30, 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Decreased regulatory T cells and increased monocytes are observed in peripheral blood of obese mice.
Published 2022Subjects: -
18
-
19
IR-induced mutation profiles of DNA repair mutants significantly different from wild-type.
Published 2021Subjects: -
20
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”