Showing 1,861 - 1,880 results of 21,342 for search '(( significantly higher decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 1861
  2. 1862
  3. 1863
  4. 1864
  5. 1865
  6. 1866
  7. 1867
  8. 1868
  9. 1869
  10. 1870

    Results of redundancy analysis. by Bianhua Zhang (22430652)

    Published 2025
    Subjects: “…aggregation coefficient decreased…”
  11. 1871

    Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients.... by Emir Matpan (21655811)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. …”
  12. 1872

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  13. 1873

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  14. 1874

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  15. 1875

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  16. 1876

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  17. 1877

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  18. 1878

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  19. 1879

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  20. 1880