Search alternatives:
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
different shape » different shapes (Expand Search), different scale (Expand Search), different stages (Expand Search)
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
different shape » different shapes (Expand Search), different scale (Expand Search), different stages (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
Image_1_Decreased Endometrial Thickness Is Associated With Higher Risk of Neonatal Complications in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.tif
Published 2021“…Compared to women with EMT >13 mm, women with EMT ≤8 mm also had significantly higher risk of PTB (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.53–9.39; P = 0.004), LBW (adjusted OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.39–13.50; P = 0.012) and SGA (adjusted OR 6.38, 95% CI 1.78–22.83; P = 0.004). …”
-
112
Image_2_Decreased Endometrial Thickness Is Associated With Higher Risk of Neonatal Complications in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.tif
Published 2021“…Compared to women with EMT >13 mm, women with EMT ≤8 mm also had significantly higher risk of PTB (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.53–9.39; P = 0.004), LBW (adjusted OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.39–13.50; P = 0.012) and SGA (adjusted OR 6.38, 95% CI 1.78–22.83; P = 0.004). …”
-
113
Table_1_Decreased Endometrial Thickness Is Associated With Higher Risk of Neonatal Complications in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.docx
Published 2021“…Compared to women with EMT >13 mm, women with EMT ≤8 mm also had significantly higher risk of PTB (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.53–9.39; P = 0.004), LBW (adjusted OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.39–13.50; P = 0.012) and SGA (adjusted OR 6.38, 95% CI 1.78–22.83; P = 0.004). …”
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
-
120
Absolute alignment results and global volume differences for digital and traditional shape capture.
Published 2025Subjects: