Showing 381 - 400 results of 6,889 for search '(( significantly higher decrease ) OR ( significantly ((lower decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 381

    Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  2. 382

    Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  3. 383

    Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  4. 384

    Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  5. 385

    Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  6. 386

    Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  7. 387

    Group SFA-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”
  8. 388
  9. 389
  10. 390
  11. 391
  12. 392
  13. 393

    Baseline characteristics. by Daniela Sánchez-Santiesteban (21192342)

    Published 2025
    “…In Colombia, despite a healthcare system covering 97% of the population, socioeconomic disparities persist. Lower income levels are associated with decreased survival, potentially due to delays in diagnosis or treatment and a higher probability of advanced staging at diagnosis, These inequities persist even among relatively advantaged populations, such as formal employee who are assumed to have fewer barriers to accessing healthcare services compared to informal workers.…”
  14. 394
  15. 395
  16. 396

    B2 decreases glycolytic intermediates in cells. by Craig Eyster (392633)

    Published 2025
    “…<b>(B)</b> Early glycolytic intermediates and the ratio of F-6-P to F-1,6-BP (<i>lower right</i>) are shown. <b>(C)</b> Heatmap of targeted metabolomic data. …”
  17. 397
  18. 398
  19. 399
  20. 400

    Statistical summaries. by Magdalena Kunat-Budzyńska (20565222)

    Published 2025
    “…Simultaneously, the apiary conditions resulted in higher level of oxidative stress, indicating lower effectiveness of antioxidative mechanisms. …”