Search alternatives:
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
5201
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5202
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5203
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5204
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5205
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5206
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5207
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5208
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5209
Data Sheet 1_Cynaroside ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.pdf
Published 2025“…Combining network pharmacology prediction analysis with our validation data from animal models and colonic organoids, we demonstrated that Cyn significantly inhibits IEC apoptosis, as indicated by a decrease in the proportion of TUNEL-positive cells and changes in apoptosis-related protein levels. …”
-
5210
Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”
-
5211
Data Sheet 1_Unveiling spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem service value: interpretable HGB-SHAP machine learning model.docx
Published 2025“…In contrast, the soil organic matter (SOC) demonstrated a non-linear, highly significant positive correlation with ESV.…”
-
5212
Image 1_SQLE-mediated squalene metabolism promotes tumor immune evasion in pancreatic cancer.tif
Published 2024“…RT-PCR and Western blot analyses were used to investigate the relevant molecular mechanisms.</p>Results<p>We show that SQLE is significantly overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and abrogation of SQLE results in a significant increase in squalene accumulation within tumor cells. …”
-
5213
General participant characteristics.
Published 2025“…The hepatic transcriptome changed significantly during a standardized meal and these changes were blunted in patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis. …”
-
5214
Table1_Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system.docx
Published 2024“…The risk of AEs such as decreased platelet count, anemia, decreased white blood cell count, pneumonitis, asthenia, and edema caused by pralsetinib is significantly higher than that of selpercatinib. …”
-
5215
Image2_Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system.TIF
Published 2024“…The risk of AEs such as decreased platelet count, anemia, decreased white blood cell count, pneumonitis, asthenia, and edema caused by pralsetinib is significantly higher than that of selpercatinib. …”
-
5216
Table2_Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system.docx
Published 2024“…The risk of AEs such as decreased platelet count, anemia, decreased white blood cell count, pneumonitis, asthenia, and edema caused by pralsetinib is significantly higher than that of selpercatinib. …”
-
5217
Image1_Adverse event profile differences between pralsetinib and selpercatinib: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse events reporting system.TIF
Published 2024“…The risk of AEs such as decreased platelet count, anemia, decreased white blood cell count, pneumonitis, asthenia, and edema caused by pralsetinib is significantly higher than that of selpercatinib. …”
-
5218
Presentation 1_Germination responses of native fire ephemerals of Patagonian grasslands to smoke water and karrikinolide.zip
Published 2025“…Seeds collected on different harvest dates were incubated in a germination chamber, and germination responses were analyzed using Generalized Linear Models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. KAR<sub>1</sub> significantly enhanced and accelerated germination in both species, with the strongest effect at the highest concentration (1/100). …”
-
5219
Scale and environmental data for the analysis of year class growth of coregonids from Lake Starnberg
Published 2025“…During the observed period, phosphorus concentrations decreased, indicating reduced nutrient availability, whereas spring temperatures showed no significant long-term trend. …”
-
5220
Does policy integration in renewable energy deployment enhance environmental sustainability in Africa?
Published 2024“…Using data from 41 SSA countries from 1998 to 2020, we employ the generalized linear model (GLM) and panel quantile regression to address methodological challenges. …”