Showing 1,821 - 1,840 results of 5,565 for search '(( significantly higher decrease ) OR ( significantly ((weaker decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 1821

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  2. 1822

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  3. 1823

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  4. 1824

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  5. 1825

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  6. 1826

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  7. 1827

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? …”
  8. 1828

    Statistical summaries. by Magdalena Kunat-Budzyńska (20565222)

    Published 2025
    “…The greatest difference was noted in the case of PO activity in 28-day-old infected honeybees in May, when the activity was 32.3 times higher in honeybees kept in the apiary than in the laboratory, suggesting that environmental conditions have a significant influence on the immune response of honeybees. …”
  9. 1829

    Enteropathogen detection and fCal levels. by Muhammad Rehan (406524)

    Published 2025
    “…Samples positive for <i><i>Shigella</i></i> had significantly higher fCal than samples positive for rotavirus. …”
  10. 1830
  11. 1831

    Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  12. 1832

    Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  13. 1833

    Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  14. 1834

    Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  15. 1835

    Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  16. 1836

    Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  17. 1837

    Group SFA-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  18. 1838
  19. 1839
  20. 1840