Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

Subjects:

Correlations between significantly different microbiota and metabolites. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

Subjects:

Box plots showing the taxa that were significantly different between thin and normal cows. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

Subjects:

Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation by Xiaoyu Shen (4715430)

“…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …”

A slight negative trend in the relationship between U-Cd levels and BMD in both 2019 and 2022, as evident from the slightly downward-sloping regression lines in both years. However... by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

The difference of BMD between 2019 and 2022 classify by grop of urinary camium levels measured in 2019. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Non-linear relationship between urinary cadmium and bone mineral density from the adjusted restricted cubic splines model. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Prevalence of osteoporosis classified by sex, and urinary cadmium level compare between 2019 and 2022. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Linear Mixed-Effects Model analysis of bone mineral density changes in relation to urinary cadmium levels in a 3-Year Period. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Data. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Stratified analysis of the association between urinary cadmium and bone mineral density, by sex. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Association between baseline urinary cadmium and the three-year change in bone mineral density (ΔBMD). by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Characteristics of the study participants for continuous variables. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

Subjects:

Experiment setting. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”

Experimental flow. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”

Example of Group C scene material. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”

SAGAT Assessment Sample Questions. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”

3x3 Latin square design. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”

Sensory attributes of beef sausages containing different fats and cooked at different temperatures. by Kazeem Dauda Adeyemi (21181818)

Subjects:

Cholesterol and Cholesterol oxides in beef sausages containing different fats and roasted at different temperature. by Kazeem Dauda Adeyemi (21181818)

Subjects: