Search alternatives:
significantly increases » significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search)
increases decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
significantly increases » significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search)
increases decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
significantly i » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
107
HFD decreases ITM and alters metabolic homeostasis.
Published 2025“…Two-way ANOVA, n.s., not significant, ** p < 0.01). <b>(F)</b> Long-term memory (LTM) was significantly decreased in the HFD group. …”
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
116
-
117
-
118
Normalized significant family changes in abundance.
Published 2025“…<p>A) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with CCE treatment; B) <i>Bacteroidales_unclassified</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; C) <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; D) <i>Rikenellaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; E) <i>Coriobacteriaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; F) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with TRE treatment.…”
-
119
-
120