Search alternatives:
significantly impair » significantly impairs (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
smaller decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), smaller areas (Expand Search)
small area » small rna (Expand Search), small target (Expand Search)
significantly impair » significantly impairs (Expand Search), significantly impaired (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
smaller decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), smaller areas (Expand Search)
small area » small rna (Expand Search), small target (Expand Search)
-
2041
-
2042
-
2043
-
2044
-
2045
-
2046
-
2047
-
2048
-
2049
-
2050
-
2051
-
2052
-
2053
-
2054
-
2055
(A) Hierarchical clustering analysis of fish taxa versus δ<sup>15</sup>N and δ<sup>13</sup>C concentrations in liver samples. Fish-feeding strategy is represented with a (P) for predator or (B) for bottom-feeding next to the common name. Significance within the analysis was assessed by examining the dendrogram and the distances between clusters. The longer line segments suggest greater dissimilarity between clusters, indicating more significant separation between samples. (B) Visualization of Bayesian-based stable isotope standard ellipse areas (see Jackson et al. 2011) for fish within each location (Cochiti Reservoir, Abiquiu Reservoir, and the Rio Grande) in our sample [36]. Following Jackson et al. 2011 and a recent application by Dombrosky et al. 2020, we use small sample size corrected standard ellipse areas for our visualization of isotopic niche width [
Published 2025“…Following Jackson et al. 2011 and a recent application by Dombrosky et al. 2020, we use small sample size corrected standard ellipse areas for our visualization of isotopic niche width [</p>…”
-
2056
-
2057
<i>ATP5E</i>, <i>COX6C</i> and <i>RPL9</i> overall promoter DNA methylation by MetS status.
Published 2021Subjects: -
2058
-
2059
-
2060