Showing 3,001 - 3,020 results of 21,342 for search '(( significantly improve decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 3001
  2. 3002
  3. 3003
  4. 3004
  5. 3005

    IDA flowchart. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  6. 3006

    Ablation test results of QIMPN-PCA-DC model. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  7. 3007

    QIMPN framework diagram. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  8. 3008

    Multiple indicator test results. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  9. 3009

    I/L type node quality entity type. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  10. 3010

    Testing function diagram of QIMPN-PCA-DC. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  11. 3011

    Node coding process. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  12. 3012
  13. 3013

    MGPC module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  14. 3014

    Comparative experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  15. 3015

    Pruning experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  16. 3016

    Parameter setting table. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  17. 3017

    DTADH module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  18. 3018

    Ablation experiment. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  19. 3019

    Multi scale detection. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
  20. 3020

    MFDPN module. by Bo Tong (2138632)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”