Search alternatives:
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
significantly improve » significantly improved (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
improve decrease » improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search), improves disease (Expand Search)
-
4201
Outcomes and interventions by group comparison.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4202
S1 Fig.pdf -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4203
Baseline characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4204
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4205
Participant enrollment.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4206
S1 Appendix -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4207
Change in STAI scores after counseling.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4208
S1 Protocol -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
4209
-
4210
-
4211
-
4212
-
4213
-
4214
-
4215
Overcoming the Limitations of Transition-Metal Catalysis in the Chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Resolution (DKR) of Atropisomeric Bisnaphthols
Published 2024“…Such a reliable ligand offers π* orbitals, allowing additional metal-to-ligand d−π* back-donation, which can significantly enhance coordination effects between the ligand and metal. …”
-
4216
Overcoming the Limitations of Transition-Metal Catalysis in the Chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Resolution (DKR) of Atropisomeric Bisnaphthols
Published 2024“…Such a reliable ligand offers π* orbitals, allowing additional metal-to-ligand d−π* back-donation, which can significantly enhance coordination effects between the ligand and metal. …”
-
4217
Operator parameter setting of improved GA.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
4218
The state of each node after improvement.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
4219
The state of each node before improvement.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
4220
Improved YOLOv10 network structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results demonstrate that when compared to YOLOv10, S-YOLOv10-ASI shows significant improvements across various metrics. Specifically, Bounding Box Regression Loss decreases by over 30% in the training set, while Classification Loss and Bounding Box Regression Loss drop by more than 60% in the validation set. …”