Search alternatives:
significantly improves » significantly improved (Expand Search), significantly improve (Expand Search), significantly improving (Expand Search)
improves decrease » improves disease (Expand Search), improve disease (Expand Search), improved urease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
Showing 1,901 - 1,920 results of 14,839 for search '(( significantly improves decrease ) OR ( significant increase decrease ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1901
    General information of patient who diagnosis insomnia disorder (N = 518,119).

    General information of patient who diagnosis insomnia disorder (N = 518,119). by Mingee Choi (15250732)

    Published 2025
    Subjects: “…treatment initiation decreased…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 1902
    Detailed treatment status of people who received non- pharmacological treatment at first diagnosis.

    Detailed treatment status of people who received non- pharmacological treatment at first diagnosis. by Mingee Choi (15250732)

    Published 2025
    Subjects: “…treatment initiation decreased…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 1903
    Treatment at first diagnosis of insomnia disorder (%).

    Treatment at first diagnosis of insomnia disorder (%). by Mingee Choi (15250732)

    Published 2025
    Subjects: “…treatment initiation decreased…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 1904
    GRADE judgements.

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 1905
    Basic characteristics of the included studies.

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 1906
    The data of meta-analysis.

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 1907
    Risk of bias.

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 1908
    Overall risk of bias assessment.

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 1909
    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 1910
    Analysis of subgroups.

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 1911
    Regional work heterogeneity in LBBB differs between responders and non-responders, but LV stroke work, myocardial work, and efficiency do not.

    Regional work heterogeneity in LBBB differs between responders and non-responders, but LV stroke work, myocardial work, and efficiency do not. by Amanda Craine (19832365)

    Published 2024
    “…Changes in stroke work, and total myocardial work after CRT were not significant, whereas η increased after CRT though this change was only significant for non-responders. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 1912
    Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.

    Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 1913
    Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 1914
    Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 1915
    Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.

    Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 1916
    Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories.

    Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 1917
    Multiple linear regression analysis results.

    Multiple linear regression analysis results. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 1918
    Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 1919
    Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories.

    Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 1920
    Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels.

    Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: