Search alternatives:
significantly increase » significantly increased (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
significantly increase » significantly increased (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significantly decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
-
2701
-
2702
-
2703
-
2704
-
2705
-
2706
-
2707
-
2708
-
2709
-
2710
-
2711
Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for the prediction of hepatitis C.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2712
-
2713
-
2714
-
2715
-
2716
-
2717
-
2718
Comparison of systemic inflammation biomarkers in infected and uninfected populations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2719
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2720
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”