Showing 981 - 1,000 results of 15,169 for search '(( significantly increased decrease ) OR ( significance ((tests decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 981
  2. 982
  3. 983
  4. 984
  5. 985
  6. 986
  7. 987
  8. 988
  9. 989

    S1 Data - by Asnake Adane (19935018)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  10. 990
  11. 991

    Effects of increasing gravel on initial escape latency in non-injured <i>vs.</i> by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

    Published 2025
    “…</b> However latency was significantly decrease for the 40 g condition in the injured day 0 animals. **** indicates significant differences across increasing amounts of gravel (p < 0.0001). * indicates a post-hoc test confirming a significant difference between injured and non-injured animals 40 g (p < 0.05).…”
  12. 992

    Realistic structure diagram of testing equipment. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  13. 993

    Scheme of the test section. by Decang Lou (21439960)

    Published 2025
    “…However, when the simulated surface temperature of the vane was compared with the cooling test data, in which the vane was 3D-printed, significant deviation of the surface temperature distribution was observed. …”
  14. 994

    Main test parameters. by Decang Lou (21439960)

    Published 2025
    “…However, when the simulated surface temperature of the vane was compared with the cooling test data, in which the vane was 3D-printed, significant deviation of the surface temperature distribution was observed. …”
  15. 995

    Schematic of the test equipment. by Decang Lou (21439960)

    Published 2025
    “…However, when the simulated surface temperature of the vane was compared with the cooling test data, in which the vane was 3D-printed, significant deviation of the surface temperature distribution was observed. …”
  16. 996
  17. 997
  18. 998
  19. 999
  20. 1000