بدائل البحث:
significantly increased » significant increase (توسيع البحث)
increased decrease » increased release (توسيع البحث), increased crash (توسيع البحث)
step decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
significantly increased » significant increase (توسيع البحث)
increased decrease » increased release (توسيع البحث), increased crash (توسيع البحث)
step decrease » sizes decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
-
12761
Principal component analysis of soil parameters.
منشور في 2025"…P, TN, CEC, OM, extractable micronutrients like Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn decreased with increasing soil depth, while the clay content, BD, pH, and exchangeable bases like Ca, Mg, Na, and K were increased with increasing soil depth. …"
-
12762
<b>Data for opposing effects</b><b> of maize straw and its biochar on soil N</b><sub><strong>2</strong></sub><b>O emissions</b><b> </b><b>by mediating microbial nitrification and d...
منشور في 2025"…However, biochar addition (5 t C ha<sup>−1</sup>) reduced available N, i.e., 11.1–13.9% for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, 11.0–14.8% for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and 13.8–16.6% WSON, and decreased the abundances of nitrification/denitrification genes (39.0–44.6% for AOB <i>amoA</i>, 29.5–35.5% for <i>nirK</i>, 24.4–31.8% for <i>nirS</i>) and associated genera <i>Nitrosospira</i>, <i>Mesorhizobium</i>, <i>Bradyrhizobium</i>, <i>Rhizobium</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i>, and <i>Cupriavidus</i>. …"
-
12763
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12764
The analysis procedure.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12765
Rank of mutation fitness.
منشور في 2025"…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …"
-
12766
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12767
Soil mechanical parameters.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12768
Parameters of the contact surface.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12769
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12770
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12771
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12772
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
منشور في 2025"…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …"
-
12773
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
منشور في 2025"…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …"
-
12774
-
12775
-
12776
-
12777
Overall model framework.
منشور في 2024"…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …"
-
12778
Key parameters of LSTM training model.
منشور في 2024"…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …"
-
12779
Comparison chart of model evaluation results.
منشور في 2024"…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …"
-
12780
Model performance evaluation results.
منشور في 2024"…On the other hand, taking English writing teaching as an example, the proposed method is further verified by designing a comparative experiment in groups. The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …"