Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…We found that colony losses during the rainy season decreased with higher abundance of forested areas and increased with higher abundance of agricultural area around meliponaries. …”
-
10
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Participants were categorized by LVEDD change from baseline: No Change (<5 mm), Decreased (≥5 mm), and Increased (≥5 mm). Results: A decrease in LVEDD was observed in 24% of participants (mean change -9±3 mm) and was significantly associated with older age, female sex, decreased volumes, concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. …”
-
11
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
20