Showing 1 - 20 results of 192 for search '(( significantly increased decrease ) OR ( significant ((bins decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.39s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Soil disturbance cross-sectional model. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  8. 8

    Test plan table. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  9. 9

    Gas jet subsoiling model. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  10. 10

    Schematic diagram of the airflow passage. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  11. 11

    Variation in soil penetration resistance. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  12. 12

    Supersonic gas jet subsoiler experiment. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Under these conditions, the maximum drag reduction rate reaches 16.66%, and the soil disturbance area increases by up to 22.48%, significantly enhancing the drag reduction effect and soil fragmentation efficiency during subsoiling operations. …”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Evaluation results. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  19. 19

    Dataset with steel insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  20. 20

    Reference dataset. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”