Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
green decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
green decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
-
501
-
502
-
503
-
504
(a to g) Administration of vitamin D3 increased serum phosphorus and triglycerides.
Published 2025“…Analyses of serum cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides also showed a non-significant decrease in the serum HDL level upon treatment with 125 µg/Kg vitamin D3, but a noticeable increase in the serum triglyceride level was observed with 125 µg/Kg of vitamin D3.…”
-
505
-
506
-
507
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…</b> Histogram depicting the distribution of increased and decreased miRNAs between control and CRS mice. …”
-
508
Remyelination in adulthood leads to an incomplete restoration of PV interneuron properties.
Published 2025“…Average action potential (AP) frequency in response to 0-650 pA current steps illustrating a significant decrease in PV interneuron firing frequency in remyelination (green) mice (<i>group x current two-way repeated measures: n = 25/19 cells from 8 mice per group: F(13,546) = 3.962, ***p < 0.001</i>). …”
-
509
-
510
-
511
-
512
Akt3 null animals have reduced Aurora B expression and proliferation and increased apoptosis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
513
-
514
Normalized significant family changes in abundance.
Published 2025“…<p>A) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with CCE treatment; B) <i>Bacteroidales_unclassified</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; C) <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; D) <i>Rikenellaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; E) <i>Coriobacteriaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; F) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with TRE treatment.…”
-
515
Benchmark regression results.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
516
Heterogeneity test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
517
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
518
The robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
519
Mechanistic testing.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
520
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”