Showing 81 - 100 results of 19,662 for search '(( significantly increased decrease ) OR ( significant ((point decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.80s Refine Results
  1. 81

    Image 2_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  2. 82

    Image 5_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  3. 83

    Image 3_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  4. 84

    Image 1_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  5. 85

    Image 4_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  6. 86

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
  7. 87
  8. 88

    Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  9. 89

    Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  10. 90
  11. 91
  12. 92
  13. 93
  14. 94
  15. 95

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  16. 96
  17. 97
  18. 98
  19. 99
  20. 100