Showing 261 - 280 results of 12,900 for search '(( significantly increased decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.66s Refine Results
  1. 261
  2. 262

    Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  3. 263

    Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  4. 264
  5. 265
  6. 266
  7. 267

    S1 Data - by Beat Knechtle (5504402)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  8. 268

    S2 Data - by Beat Knechtle (5504402)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  9. 269
  10. 270
  11. 271
  12. 272
  13. 273
  14. 274
  15. 275
  16. 276
  17. 277
  18. 278
  19. 279
  20. 280

    Actual measurement of shape errors. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”