Showing 661 - 680 results of 13,377 for search '(( significantly increased decrease ) OR ( significant ((shape decrease) OR (small decrease)) ))*', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 661
  2. 662
  3. 663
  4. 664
  5. 665
  6. 666
  7. 667
  8. 668
  9. 669
  10. 670
  11. 671
  12. 672
  13. 673

    Cross-sectional dependence results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  14. 674

    Autocorrelation test results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  15. 675

    Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  16. 676

    Descriptive statistics of related variables. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  17. 677

    Source data - by Desheng Xie (21439869)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that: 1) Vegetation cover in the affected regions decreased from 0.43 to 0.38 between 2017 and 2024, with Fire Zone 1 showing minimal recovery and Fire Zone 3 exhibiting moderate improvement, though the overall low vegetation area expanded due to ongoing fires; 2) The Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) declined from 0.41 to 0.38, with poor-rated areas increasing significantly, particularly in Fire Zone 3, reflecting the ongoing degradation of ecological conditions caused by both fire activity and climate factors; 3) The Flat Spectral Shape Index (FSSI) showed stability, but fluctuations in the areas with moderate and high probability of exposed coal, especially in Fire Zone 3, pointed to the expanding fire footprint and worsening ecological degradation; 4) Surface subsidence varied considerably, with Fire Zone 3 experiencing the most severe subsidence, indicating unstable geological conditions exacerbated by fire activity. …”
  18. 678
  19. 679
  20. 680