Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1201
-
1202
-
1203
Variation law of attenuation constant of sandstone with different loading rates.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1204
-
1205
-
1206
Stress-strain curves of freeze-thaw cycling sandstone under different loading rates.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1207
-
1208
-
1209
-
1210
-
1211
-
1212
-
1213
-
1214
-
1215
Time to onset of AEs in male and female patients receiving finasteride therapy.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1216
-
1217
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
1218
Basic characteristics included in the study.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our meta-analysis indicates that a shorter time since the last birth is protective against endometrial cancer, whereas a longer interval increases risk. …”
-
1219
Publication bias of the risk of all groups.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our meta-analysis indicates that a shorter time since the last birth is protective against endometrial cancer, whereas a longer interval increases risk. …”
-
1220
Study selection process.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Our meta-analysis indicates that a shorter time since the last birth is protective against endometrial cancer, whereas a longer interval increases risk. …”