Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
spatial panel » spatial model (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
spatial panel » spatial model (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Spatial Dubin panel model estimation results.
Published 2024“…It is found that: (1) the scale and vitality of China’s digital technology innovation have increased significantly, and there are obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, and the innovation level of "eastern coastal—central and western interior" is decreasing, forming a cluster distribution pattern in the Yangtze River Delta region, Beijing, Guangdong, and other places, and the degree of agglomeration is decreasing. (2) The overall regional differences in China’s digital technology innovation are large, the differences between the East and the West dominate the interregional differences, and the net differences between regions are the main factors leading to regional differences. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation, which has a significant spatial spillover effect. (4) The results confirm that the level of economic development, digital access, financial scientific and technological support, technology market development level, and R&D intensity have a significant positive impact on the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation; The investment in scientific and technological talents has a significant positive impact on the scale of digital technology innovation, but has no significant impact on the vitality of digital technology innovation.…”
-
3
-
4
List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis.
Published 2022“…<p>List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis.…”
-
5
Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration.
Published 2022“…Encapsulation efficiency decreased with increasing starting bacterial concentrations. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
10
-
11
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
12
-
13
Spatial learning (top panel) and memory (bottom panel) in the MWM test are not significantly affected by HF at 7–8 weeks post MI.
Published 2019“…<p>Chronic treatment with minocycline increases latency to platform (spatial learning), but does not significantly affect spatial memory. …”
-
14
-
15
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Top: example of selective channel for left hemifield-cued trials to illustrate analysis approach to identify spatially selective channels. If power was above the threshold (<i>z</i> > 1.96) for a minimum of 10% of the time window (500 ms) after the cue, the channel was considered hemifield-selective. …”
-
20