Showing 1 - 20 results of 18,178 for search '(( significantly influenced decrease ) OR ( significantly ((teer decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…The swelling pressure of reinforced expansive soil exhibits a significant negative correlation with both the UHMWPE content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and its length. …”
  6. 6

    Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…The swelling pressure of reinforced expansive soil exhibits a significant negative correlation with both the UHMWPE content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and its length. …”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx by Le Zhang (88249)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Global damming of rivers strongly impacts the transport and characteristic of sediment, resulting in a significant reduction in the suspended sediment content (SSC) flowing into the downstream. …”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047). by Adriana Bittencourt Campaner (21175462)

    Published 2025
    “…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20