Showing 21 - 40 results of 8,321 for search '(( significantly larger decrease ) OR ( significant progress during ))', query time: 0.48s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23

    Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32

    Academic achievement during medical school. by Eun-Kyung Chung (417805)

    Published 2024
    “…Participating in club activities had a significant association with medical students’ academic advancement delay or leave of absence during the entire course of medical school (P = 0.007). …”
  13. 33

    Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36

    Reconstructing EMT regulatory networks during bladder cancer progression. by Xiaoqiang Sun (493308)

    Published 2021
    “…CDH1 is a marker gene of epithelial state during EMT. (<b>e</b>) A decrease in EMT score indicated a transition from epithelial to mesenchymal state during the progression of UC to SARC. …”
  17. 37

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40