Search alternatives:
significantly larger » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1541
Supersonic gas jet subsoiler experiment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
-
1542
-
1543
Original data2.
Published 2025“…Our analysis revealed that <i>RP11-502I4.3</i> expression was lower in the retinas of diabetic rats and HG-stimulated HRMECs compared with normal glucose conditions. …”
-
1544
Original data1.
Published 2025“…Our analysis revealed that <i>RP11-502I4.3</i> expression was lower in the retinas of diabetic rats and HG-stimulated HRMECs compared with normal glucose conditions. …”
-
1545
-
1546
-
1547
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1548
The results of endogenous analysis.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1549
Correlation test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1550
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1551
The mediation of confidence.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1552
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1553
The effects of consumption inequality on SWB.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
1554
-
1555
Functional and strength parameters.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Bilateral quantitative MRI of the lower limbs was performed in individuals with LGMD-R9 and healthy controls. …”
-
1556
Baseline characteristics.
Published 2025“…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
-
1557
Data ste.
Published 2025“…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
-
1558
Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures.
Published 2025“…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
-
1559
-
1560