Search alternatives:
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Different ellipsoidal particles with De = 6.30 mm used in the discrete element simulations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
Stress concentration factor value in the numerical samples with different shapes and sizes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
Comparative analysis of the proposed modified contact model against previous approaches.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
Fabric anisotropy evolution of numerical samples with different shapes and sizes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
Numerical samples composed of elongated ellipsoids before and after triaxial compression.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”