Search alternatives:
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
-
341
-
342
Workflow for selecting IV and MR analysis.
Published 2024“…The results indicate that vitamin D levels are not significantly causally related to PD risk at the genetic level. …”
-
343
-
344
Channel pruning process.
Published 2025“…<p>After channel pruning, the algorithm model experiences a significant reduction in parameters and computational load, yet it may incur a decrease in accuracy. …”
-
345
Raw data underlying the findings in this study.
Published 2024“…The relative bone density significantly decreased as standard length and condition factor (<i>K</i>) increased in both sexes. …”
-
346
Map showing the intervention and control LGAs.
Published 2025“…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
-
347
Consort diagram.
Published 2025“…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
-
348
-
349
-
350
Validation and predictive accuracy of the cerebrovascular model,
Published 2025“…A larger variability in resistance is observed in L4 compared to upper layers. …”
-
351
Balance test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
352
Mechanism analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
353
Endogenous test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
354
Heterogeneity analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
355
Robustness test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
356
Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
357
The influencing factors of RLM.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
358
Variable definitions and basic statistics.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
359
Average and marginal effects of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
360