Search alternatives:
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
8
-
9
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Structure stabilizes larger numbers of species, but increasing competitive asymmetry increases species loss.
Published 2021“…<b>(B)</b> Comparing identical conditions between two different system sizes (<i>L</i> = 100 and <i>L</i> = 200), the effects of disorder are relatively small in comparison to the effects of system size, with smaller system sizes (blue lines) showing a significant amplification of reduction in survival probability as compared to the larger system. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Plot of mean vigor by group and time.
Published 2024“…However, this was not statistically significant. Strong evidence suggests there was a significant improvement in BO for the Heartfulness group between Week 0 and Week 6 (p = 0.002), as well as STS (p = 0.0004) and vigor (p = 0.0392). …”
-
20
Plot of mean Burnout by group and time.
Published 2024“…However, this was not statistically significant. Strong evidence suggests there was a significant improvement in BO for the Heartfulness group between Week 0 and Week 6 (p = 0.002), as well as STS (p = 0.0004) and vigor (p = 0.0392). …”