Search alternatives:
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Evolution of ISI distributions as a function of number of inputs in input encoding.
Published 2023Subjects: -
7
Response determinism of event-based input encodings with varying input history.
Published 2023Subjects: -
8
Spike prediction coherence and NST standard deviation as a function of size of recent event history.
Published 2023Subjects: -
9
Spike train replicability of CA1 pyramidal cell model with event-based input encoding.
Published 2023Subjects: -
10
-
11
Sensitized BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> produce significantly less alloantibody against foreign antigens.
Published 2022Subjects: -
12
-
13
Are larger primates less faunivorous? Consumption of arthropods by Amazonian primates does not fulfil the Jarman-Bell and Kay models
Published 2022“…There was a slight tendency for the decrease in the relative content of arthropods in the diet with increased body mass in medium and large primates, which does not provide full support for the Jarman-Bell and Kay models. …”
-
14
-
15
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
APRIL<sup>-/-</sup>/BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> rodents produced significantly less DSA compared to WT.
Published 2022Subjects: -
19
-
20