Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly level » significant level (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly level » significant level (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2661
Sequences of PCR primers.
Published 2024“…The expression of MMP-12 was significantly increased in CRSwNP and M2-like THP-1 cells. …”
-
2662
S1 Raw data -
Published 2024“…The expression of MMP-12 was significantly increased in CRSwNP and M2-like THP-1 cells. …”
-
2663
-
2664
-
2665
-
2666
-
2667
-
2668
-
2669
-
2670
-
2671
-
2672
Fluorescence Imaging of Neuroblastocyte Differentiation and Parkinson’s Brain Tissue Lesions Examined by a Norepinephrine-Activated Molecular Probe
Published 2025“…Compared to the previously developed probe <i><b>SXU-NEQ</b></i>, the self-fluorescence intensity of probe <i><b>DQF</b></i> decreased significantly (I<i><sub><b>DQF</b></sub></i>/I<i><sub><b>SXU‑NEQ</b></sub></i> = 35%). …”
-
2673
Regression results of the Callaway method.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2674
Regression results of crowding out effects.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2675
Article data.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2676
Overidentification test results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2677
Quantile regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2678
Instrumental variable regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2679
Other robust regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
2680
Baseline regression results.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”