بدائل البحث:
significantly lighter » significantly higher (توسيع البحث), significantly lower (توسيع البحث), significantly greater (توسيع البحث)
lighter decrease » slight decrease (توسيع البحث), slightly decreases (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
marked decrease » marked increase (توسيع البحث)
significantly lighter » significantly higher (توسيع البحث), significantly lower (توسيع البحث), significantly greater (توسيع البحث)
lighter decrease » slight decrease (توسيع البحث), slightly decreases (توسيع البحث), greater decrease (توسيع البحث)
marked decrease » marked increase (توسيع البحث)
-
1
-
2
-
3
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Altered expression of genes related to Ca<sup>2+</sup> cycling or myocardial contraction.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
منشور في 2024"…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …"
-
18
-
19
Subset of juvenile <i>M</i>. <i>arenaria</i> specimens at the end of the experiment.
منشور في 2024الموضوعات: -
20
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
منشور في 2025"…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …"