Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
Volitional control frequency and intensity in VH (Kapsner-Smith et al., 2025)
Published 2025“…Singers produced significantly smaller mean smallest changes of both <i>F</i>0 and intensity than nonsingers.…”
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
Changes in alpha diversity in the weeks before anti-TNF-a treatment.
Published 2024“…The analysis found a significant association across all subjects for Shannon diversity with decreasing diversity in the lead up to the next treatment (lmer model, beta = -0.018, <i>p</i> = 0.036) and no association for observed diversity (<i>p</i>>0.1). …”
-
93
AZ10606120 treatment significantly increased cytotoxicity and reduced cell number in a dose-dependent manner.
Published 2025“…Cell numbers were significantly decreased in cells after treatment with AZ10606120 (50µM) compared to both temozolomide (TMZ; 50µM) treatment and untreated controls. …”
-
94
-
95
-
96
Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: