Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
gender decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 5 results of 5 for search '(( significantly linear decrease ) OR ( significant ((gender decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.45s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Study-related adverse events.

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Study flow chart.

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Study CONSORT diagram.

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Table 2_Global, regional and national patterns and gender disparity of intraocular foreign bodies from 1990 to 2021.doc

    Table 2_Global, regional and national patterns and gender disparity of intraocular foreign bodies from 1990 to 2021.doc by Yi Shan (160293)

    Published 2025
    “…Pearson’s correlations (r = 0.3093, p < 0.001) and linear regression (Y = 4.850*X − 1.857) revealed a significant positive association between gender differences and SDI. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Table 1_Global, regional and national patterns and gender disparity of intraocular foreign bodies from 1990 to 2021.doc

    Table 1_Global, regional and national patterns and gender disparity of intraocular foreign bodies from 1990 to 2021.doc by Yi Shan (160293)

    Published 2025
    “…Pearson’s correlations (r = 0.3093, p < 0.001) and linear regression (Y = 4.850*X − 1.857) revealed a significant positive association between gender differences and SDI. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: