Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
118
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
119
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
120
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”