Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction increases » infection increases (Expand Search), interventions increased (Expand Search), intervention decreases (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction increases » infection increases (Expand Search), interventions increased (Expand Search), intervention decreases (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
61
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
62
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
63
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
64
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
65
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
66
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
67
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
68
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
69
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80