Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
better decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 3,298 for search '(( significantly linear decrease ) OR ( significantly ((better decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 41
    Soil partice-size distribution.

    Soil partice-size distribution. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

    Published 2025
    “…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period.

    General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period. by Kathryn Knodel (20036529)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Why does task performance decrease with burst length?

    Why does task performance decrease with burst length? by Swathi Anil (17382903)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect.

    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect. by Getachew Magnar Kitila (19935139)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    Join-point regression analysis of the statistically significant linear increase in use of anxiolytics, psychostimulants and noot ropic drugs, sedatives and hypnotics, gabapentinoids during the observed time period.

    Join-point regression analysis of the statistically significant linear increase in use of anxiolytics, psychostimulants and noot ropic drugs, sedatives and hypnotics, gabapentinoid... by Jelena Filimonovic (22305307)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    The results of linear mixed model.

    The results of linear mixed model. by Soheila Qanbari (20455173)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Univariate linear regression analysis of scales.

    Univariate linear regression analysis of scales. by Xiangyu Wang (341093)

    Published 2025
    “…Moreover, Life Sciences & Medicine students demonstrated a greater tendency toward negative self-perception, low psychological well-being level, and decreased creative self-efficacy, compared to peers in other disciplines.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.

    Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    Hardness increase across different IDDSI levels and food categories.

    Hardness increase across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.

    Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories.

    Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels.

    Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories.

    Adhesiveness changes across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels.

    Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.

    Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features.

    Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    Estimation of the coefficients of a generalised linear model of posttraumatic stress symptomatology.

    Estimation of the coefficients of a generalised linear model of posttraumatic stress symptomatology. by Beatriz Arregui-Gallego (21553735)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: