Table 1_Affective bias predicts changes in depression during deep brain stimulation therapy.docx by Brian Cui (20932658)

“…</p>Results<p>We observed significant improvements in total affective bias scores over the course of DBS treatment in both cohorts. …”

Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…The E₂ decline also decreased the oocyte yield and embryo yield, but the live birth following fresh transfer was not affected after matching. …”

Analysis of differential microbiome and classification prediction model between case and control groups. by Chuan Zhang (187157)

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Mei Zhou (269746)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”

The framework diagram of this study. by Mei Zhou (269746)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”

Image 2_Changes in the gut microbiome due to diarrhea in neonatal Korean indigenous calves.jpeg by Ji-Yeong Ku (20832209)

“…These results show that diarrhea significantly affects the gut microbiome of Korean indigenous calves. …”

Image 1_Changes in the gut microbiome due to diarrhea in neonatal Korean indigenous calves.jpeg by Ji-Yeong Ku (20832209)

“…These results show that diarrhea significantly affects the gut microbiome of Korean indigenous calves. …”

Theoretical framework. by Dinku Mechal (21273002)

“…For quantitative part, pretested a self-administered five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used and analyzed using SPSS® -version 26. Assumptions of linear multivariate regression were checked and the level of significance determined at a 95% CI and p-value <0.05. …”

Supplementary file survey questioner annex. by Dinku Mechal (21273002)

“…For quantitative part, pretested a self-administered five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used and analyzed using SPSS® -version 26. Assumptions of linear multivariate regression were checked and the level of significance determined at a 95% CI and p-value <0.05. …”

Table 1_Ultrasonographic assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter on the affected and unaffected sides as a predictor of clinical deterioration at discharge in patients with large... by Changlan Li (704841)

“…The optimal cut-off for predicting deterioration was 5.54 mm for affected-side ONSD (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 78.9%, AUC = 0.814) versus 5.57 mm for the unaffected-side (68.8, 78.9%, AUC = 0.757), with no significant AUC difference between sides. …”