Search alternatives:
significantly greater » significantly correlated (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significantly greater » significantly correlated (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Test soil parameters.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
9
Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
10
UHMWPF parameters.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
11
Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
12
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…When the length of UHMWPE is greater than 9 mm, there is no significant decrease in the free swelling ratio of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.165). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
18
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20