Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
significantly mean » significantly less (Expand Search), significantly mediate (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
significantly mean » significantly less (Expand Search), significantly mediate (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
Flowchart of the study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
63
Characteristics of study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
Model performance comparison.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>From 1994 to 2018, under-5 mortality in Bangladesh decreased by 76.72%. While the Linear Regression model demonstrated exceptional accuracy in forecasting trends, long-term predictions should be interpreted cautiously due to inherent uncertainties in socio-economic conditions. …”
-
70
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
71
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
72
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
73
-
74
Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex.
Published 2025“…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80