Showing 61 - 80 results of 232 for search '(( significantly linear decrease ) OR ( significantly mean decrease ))~', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  3. 63

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69

    Model performance comparison. by Shayla Naznin (13014015)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>From 1994 to 2018, under-5 mortality in Bangladesh decreased by 76.72%. While the Linear Regression model demonstrated exceptional accuracy in forecasting trends, long-term predictions should be interpreted cautiously due to inherent uncertainties in socio-economic conditions. …”
  10. 70

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  11. 71

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  12. 72

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  13. 73
  14. 74

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78
  19. 79
  20. 80