Search alternatives:
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly shorter (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly shorter (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
Pan-cancer analyses of ACADM expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
Published 2025Subjects: -
102
-
103
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
104
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
105
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
106
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
107
-
108
-
109
The relationship between road network characteristics and the severity of traffic accidents.
Published 2023Subjects: -
110
Basic information on road traffic accidents in Shandong Province from 2001 to 2019.
Published 2023Subjects: -
111
-
112
-
113
Spatial characteristics of cultivated land expansion in China during 2000~2020.
Published 2024Subjects: -
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
-
120