Search alternatives:
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
4
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
5
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
6
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
7
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
8
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
9
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…In terms of single exercise duration, exercise lasting longer than 60 minutes (MD = 6.32, 95% CI: 4.49–6.16, P < 0.001) is more effective than exercise lasting less than 60 minutes. …”
-
10
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
11
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
12
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
13
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
14
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
15
Raw data_clean.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
16
Experimental design.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
17
Characterization of the participants.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup.
Published 2025“…Eyes with the implant showed greater leukocyte infiltration and less type I collagen compared to the group without implants. …”