Search alternatives:
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
Model calculation diagram.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
22
Grid independence verification.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
23
Descriptive statistics.
Published 2025“…The analysis reveals that the SHRR program significantly reduces travel frequency, likely due to improved local accessibility that decreases the need for frequent trips. …”
-
24
Variable description.
Published 2025“…The analysis reveals that the SHRR program significantly reduces travel frequency, likely due to improved local accessibility that decreases the need for frequent trips. …”
-
25
Village characteristics.
Published 2025“…The analysis reveals that the SHRR program significantly reduces travel frequency, likely due to improved local accessibility that decreases the need for frequent trips. …”
-
26
Research data 2.
Published 2025“…The analysis reveals that the SHRR program significantly reduces travel frequency, likely due to improved local accessibility that decreases the need for frequent trips. …”
-
27
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to minimize the confounding effect from covariates identified (maximal tolerable gait speed for EMG amplitude analysis, and gender for pain intensity and performance in lumbar movement control (LMC) tests). Significant post-training improvement in pain intensity (p = 0.014) and overall performance of the LMC tests (p = 0.006) were found for those who received backward walking training. …”
-
28
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to minimize the confounding effect from covariates identified (maximal tolerable gait speed for EMG amplitude analysis, and gender for pain intensity and performance in lumbar movement control (LMC) tests). Significant post-training improvement in pain intensity (p = 0.014) and overall performance of the LMC tests (p = 0.006) were found for those who received backward walking training. …”
-
29
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to minimize the confounding effect from covariates identified (maximal tolerable gait speed for EMG amplitude analysis, and gender for pain intensity and performance in lumbar movement control (LMC) tests). Significant post-training improvement in pain intensity (p = 0.014) and overall performance of the LMC tests (p = 0.006) were found for those who received backward walking training. …”
-
30
Table 1_Esmolol improves sepsis outcomes through cardiovascular and immune modulation.docx
Published 2025“…Background<p>Sepsis poses significant mortality risks. Esmolol, a β1-adrenergic blocker, may improve outcomes through cardiovascular and immune modulation. …”
-
31
Supplementary Material for: Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Topical Timolol Improves Healed Epithelial Integrity
Published 2025“…The use of a wheelchair was also associated with a significant decrease in transepidermal water loss (Estimate = -7.7, p=0.01). …”
-
32
Table 1_Molecular hybridization modification improves the stability and immunomodulatory activity of TP5 peptide.docx
Published 2024“…The half-life of YTP in plasma is significantly longer than that of YW12D and TP5. YTP also displays an improved ability to protect the host from CTX-induced weight loss and thymus and spleen indices decrease than YW12D and TP5. …”
-
33
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
34
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
35
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
36
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
37
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
38
-
39
-
40