Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Reduction of L O-ag production and antigenic shift to O2-antigen in
Published 2025“…<p><b><i>S.</i> Paratyphi A decreases IgM binding. (</b>A) and (B) Restored <i>S.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
18
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
19
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
20
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”